2010 Chevrolet Equinox

Alternately titled: Signs of Life. I’ll be the first to admit I was more than a little skeptical of General Motors success post-chapter 11. After all, the company held onto many of the same execs who led the once mighty Detroit automaker straight into craptastic product hell. Fuel that fire with consumer base loathsome of any government hand outs and you’ve got a recipe for continued mediocrity. If you’re looking for evidence to the contrary, set your eyes on the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox. GM’s sturdy little crossover has gone under the knife in a big way, and much to my surprise, it came out damn fine. Hop the jump for a look at my impressions.

Blah

To really understand why I’m in such awe of a decidedly unfiendish vehicle, we need to take a look at the first generation Equinox. The definition of meh, the 2004-2009 crossover rocked some seriously uninspired styling outside. An Aztec-esque hood/fender line, goofy front grille and instantly-forgettable side profile didn’t do the ute any favors. Things weren’t much better inside, as a sea of black-grey materials and boring gauges prompted the NHTSA to issue a recall for a bore-to-death hazard. I’m kidding, of course, but just barely.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

It’s somewhat fitting the Equinox would get GM’s first real redesign since the fall – kind of like stitching up major arteries before taking care of nicks and bruises. The changes start small with a redesigned key fob. Heavier and more solid-feeling than the plasticy-unit standard with the first generation vehicle, the fob uses a VW-style switch-blade key, and a textured Bow Tie is emblazoned on the back. This may not seem like a huge deal, but the quality and attention to detail isn’t something we’ve seen a whole lot of from General Motors in recent months. The theme continues throughout the rest of the vehicle.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

Outside, the Equinox shirks its ho-hum looks for a little flair. The dopey front face has been replaced with the large, double-frame grille found on the Malibu, and high-intensity lamps make the crossover look more pricey than it actually is. Both sides rock serious fender arches and plenty of chrome in all the right places. Side-view mirrors, window frames and roof rails all get the shiny treatment, and sizeable 17-inch wheels are pretty snappy for a crossover. The rear of the Equinox rocks a much cleaner design over the outgoing model. The large plastic bumpers are nowhere to be found, replaced by chromed-accents and hefty exhaust tips.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

All of that’s cool as can be, but pales in comparison to the crossover’s interior. Chevrolet’s stepped its game up in a huge way when it comes to materials and color options, and the Equinox is available with sweet two-tone leather seats with slick red-stitching. A newly-designed four-spoke steering wheel replaces the clunky parts-bin unit we’re used to seeing on nearly every GM product, and the center stack is handsome and well-sorted. The preponderance of buttons may be disorienting at first, but it’s better than slogging through multiple MMI tiers. Subtle LED lighting behind the center stack, in the foot wells and door handles also add a smidge of class. The Equinox is also available with a super-sharp LCD infotainment touch-screen display miles ahead of nearly every other unit we’ve seen out there.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

A handsome set of bi-pod gauges replace the cheap flat-panel design of years past, and use the same sporty font and back-lit illumination as the Corvette. Even the turning-indicator and windshield-wiper stalks feel solid and miles better than the same equipment found on the last Equinox. Whatever GM’s putting in its design team’s coffee, we’re fans.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

Under the hood, there are two engine options, including a direct-injection 2.4-liter four-cylinder and a more potent 3.0-liter direct-injection V6. The four-pot rocks 182 horsepower and 172 lb-ft of torque, while the extra two cylinders in the V6 will nab you 264 horsepower and 222 lb-ft of torque. Mated to either mill is a new six-speed automatic transmission. You can opt for full-time all-wheel drive, though there’s a fuel economy penalty of around 2-3 mpg.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

Our tester was equipped with the 3.0-liter V6 in front-wheel drive configuration. Make no mistake, the Equinox still happily fills the slot below full-sized SUVs and above mid-size wagons, so you’re not going to be tracking this sucker anytime soon. That said, the suspension is just firm enough to nix any worries of eminent roll over, and the brakes do a fantastic job of bringing the show to a halt. The engine is surprisingly throaty when you punch the go pedal, and speed builds quickly with a series of rapid, smooth shifts. The new six-speed cog box uses some pretty quick logic to put the Equinox in the right gear at the right time, and the hesitation and confusion of the old transmission has been banished to tales of GM’s past. For the most part, driving the Equinox is as easy as you’d expect from a crossbreed, but you will find more than your share of torque steer once the engine hits the tall end of the torque band.

2010 Chevrolet Equinox

All in all, GM’s hard look at the Equinox has served the crossover well. The level of detail and quality is difficult to describe, made even more so by the ute’s $33,235 price tag as tested. That’s a small chunk of change for luxuries like a rear-view camera, two DVD screens and heated seats, not to mention the delicious interior. For The General’s sake, I hope this blip on the company’s EKG grows into a full-blown heart beat.

5 Responses to “We Drive: 2010 Chevrolet Equinox”

  1. Paul Y. says:

    As one who considers GM to be a mortal enemy, I have to admit, the new Equinox looks impressive for a vehicle I could never justify owning. I’ve driven (and heard horror stories from owners thereof) a 1st-gen, and it was absolutely wretched. Even with clear glass, it had astonishingly bad blind spots, and was just dangerously uninteresting to drive, even on what should have been entertaining non-interestate roads in northwestern Arkansas. The only downside to the new one seems to be that, like nearly every other new car out, you can’t see out the back worth shit. That counts a lot.

  2. JOE BABIASZ says:

    To: Paul Y.
    I find it offensive that you would consider using the term mortal enemy for a company that had in the past kept you from speaking Japanese or German today. It is typical of people like you (uninformed and not willing to find out I.E. can’t justify owning without even driving one. But that is typical of the people who buy foreign cars either because of the misconseption that they are better or just want to make a statement about yourself. Another thing about your comment. First, you are not supposed to take your eyes off the road and turn around to see what is behind you1 That’s what mirrors are for. What does a truck driver see? Nothing. He uses his mirrors. They never lie if they are positioned properly. But I guess thats how they teach in it the back roads of Arkansas. By the way, I own a 2010 Equinox, four-cylinder. Best vehicle I have ever owned. As quiet as a BMW, excellent gas mileage and comfort of a Mercedes. All for about $24,000. So in summary, it is your kind that are killing the U.S. economy for reasons unknown to logical people. I rest my case.

    • Zach Bowman says:

      Hey Joe, take a deep breath. I’m not positive, but I thought Paul Y’s comment was overall positive. Some folks just don’t like certain brands, and unfortunately GM has given buyers a lot to dislike over the past decade. Things seem to be turning around, though. How many miles have you clocked on your Equinox?

  3. JOE BABIASZ says:

    Zach,

    Please understand that I am passionate about supporting domestic firms if pricepoint and quality are similar to the imports that compete in their class. Its just the right thing to do. Calling GM a moral enemy is just over the top. GM, Ford and Chrysler(who unfortunately today still builds sub par quality cars)have helped make America strong and the actually start the middle class which is now crumbling like a house of cards much because of people like Paul. We have to stop looking at the past and look at how great the domestics are today. Ford is also building some killer cars with incredable quality and styling. I love the Equinox for many reasons but I love that the profit is going to an American company. I have about 2,400 miles on it now.
    Regards
    Joe

    • Zach Bowman says:

      Hm. I absolutely see where you’re coming from, but I think the Big Three are reaping what they’ve sown. Paul and buyers like him are simply responding to what they’ve been exposed to over the past few years. I think we all know someone who’s had an inexcusably bad experience with a domestic vehicle, be it a Jeep with a bad transmission at 50,000 miles or a Taurus with a cracked block at 60,000 — problems we just don’t see from other makes.

      Ford and GM are making HUGE progress from where they were just three years ago, and the Equinox is a fine example of that. It’s true our domestic manufacturers helped America’s economy in a big way for over 100 years, but you can’t expect someone to jump behind a brand for that reason alone. It’ll take people like you to take a chance with GM, Ford and Chrysler once again. Your experiences will dictate whether or not those companies succeed in the future.

      As I said in my review, it’s amazing to see how far this vehicle has come when set against the last generation. You’ll have to keep us posted as your Equinox ages. It’s always easy for us to cast a vote one way or the other when these things are brand new — it’s a little harder to judge over the life of the vehicle.

Leave a Reply